linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Add include path to Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1471345283.4075.158.camel@perches.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 04:01:23 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: lustre: Add include path to Makefile

On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 12:53 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 02:14:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 23:04 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 12:33:23PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Start to rationalize include paths in source code files.
[]
> Nah, I think it's fine the way it is.  What's wrong with the "../" type
> things in the include directives?

.. path specific includes are unnecessarily file layout sensitive.

There are identically named .h files in separate directories.

The idea was to isolate the uapi type .h files from local ones.

I'll just give this up and let the lustre folks handle it.