[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160816132933.GA11106@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 15:29:33 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Map in physical addresses in efi_map_region_fixed
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 01:30:28PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> That's impossible, because that would mean we loaded the kexec kernel
> over the top of physical pages of EFI services. We still need to be
> able to invoke EFI services from kexec - we just can't change their
> virtual mappings.
Which would mean that whatever comes second - kexec reservation or 1:1
mappings - won't work.
> This is because of the way that the SGI firmware works and that the
> "new" virtual address mappings are usable on SGI+kexec now.
My only issue is that we probably should've aimed for avoiding that...
> No, some Apple platforms will not boot if SetVirtualAddressMap()
> passes 1:1 mappings, and we only enter the firmware via the 1:1
> mappings for EFI mixed mode calls. We're still using the virtual
> runtime mappings in the commit you reference below most of the time.
... but reasons like the above are making us run the kexec kernel with
the exact-same mappings as the boot kernel. Probably not really a big
deal since we have our own pagetable...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists