linux-kernel - Re: Problem with atomic accesses in pstore on some ARM CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 08:02:53 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Problem with atomic accesses in pstore on some ARM CPUs

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:21 AM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 06:14:53AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>> > On 16/08/16 00:19, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> >> we are having a problem with atomic accesses in pstore on some ARM
>> >> CPUs (specifically rk3288 and rk3399). With those chips, atomic
>> >> accesses fail with both pgprot_noncached and pgprot_writecombine
>> >> memory. Atomic accesses do work when selecting PAGE_KERNEL protection.
>> >
>> > What's the pstore backed by? I'm guessing it's not normal DRAM.
>> >
>>
>> it is normal DRAM.
>
> In which case, why does it need to be mapped with weird attributes?
> Is there an alias in the linear map you can use?
>

I don't really _want_ to do anything besides using pstore as-is, or,
in other words, to have the upstream kernel work with the affected
systems.

The current pstore code runs the following code for memory with
pfn_valid() = true.

        if (memtype)
                prot = pgprot_noncached(PAGE_KERNEL);
        else
                prot = pgprot_writecombine(PAGE_KERNEL);
        ...
        vaddr = vmap(pages, page_count, VM_MAP, prot);

It then uses the memory pointed to by vaddr for atomic operations.

In my case, both protection options don't work. Everything works fine
(or at least doesn't create an exception) if I use
        vaddr = vmap(pages, page_count, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
instead.

Thanks,
Guenter