lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:06:03 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/34] clk: maxgen: Migrate to clk_hw based OF and
 registration APIs

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@....samsung.com> wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 02:50 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Stephen,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> Now that we have clk_hw based provider APIs to register clks, we
>>> can get rid of struct clk pointers while registering clks in
>>> these drivers, allowing us to move closer to a clear split of
>>> consumer and provider clk APIs.
>>>
>>> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
>>
>> This email address doesn't exist anymore, you can use
>> javier@....samsung.com instead.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> See commit 58657d189a2f and it's children for details on this
>>> new registration API.
>>>
>>
>> I tried this patch on top of linux-next and my Peach Pi Chromebook
>> (that has a max77802 chip) failed to boot. Following is the relevant
>> parts from the boot log:
>>
>
> It seems the mailer did a mess with the line wrapping so here's another attempt:
>

Thanks! Found the problem too.

----8<-----
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-max-gen.c b/drivers/clk/clk-max-gen.c
index 4bb53fcf8639..5e8bac190698 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-max-gen.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-max-gen.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int max_gen_clk_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev, struct regmap *regmap,

        if (dev->of_node) {
                ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev->of_node, of_clk_max_gen_get,
-                                            max_gen_clks);
+                                            max_gen_data);
                if (ret) {
                        dev_err(dev, "failed to register OF clock provider\n");
                        return ret;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ