[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160816030314.GB16913@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:03:14 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/slab: Improve performance of gathering slabinfo
stats
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 09:21:56AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > If above my comments are fixed, all counting would be done with
> > holding a lock. So, atomic definition isn't needed for the SLAB.
>
> Ditto for slub. struct kmem_cache_node is alrady defined in mm/slab.h.
> Thus it is a common definition already and can be used by both.
>
> Making nr_slabs and total_objects unsigned long would be great.
In SLUB, nr_slabs is manipulated without holding a lock so atomic
operation should be used.
Anyway, Aruna. Could you handle my comment?
Thank.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists