linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 0/2] USB Type-C Connector class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160817074421.GG9927@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:44:21 +0300
From:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Rajaram R <rajaram.officemail@...il.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/2] USB Type-C Connector class

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 09:40:16AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:38:26AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > 
> > Sorry for the long silence. I just returned from paternal leave.
> > 
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:19:25AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 09:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > I'm not going to take this series until everyone agrees on it,
> > > > sorry.
> > > > > I'll wait for you and Guenter and Oliver to all come up with a
> > > > solution
> > > > > that works for everyone.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I have not heard from Heikko for a while. There have been some
> > > > follow-up
> > > > patches in
> > > > 
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/balbi/usb.git/log/?h=bxt-typec-pd-fixes
> > > > 
> > > > but I am not really sure where this is going. I've been wondering if I
> > > > can/should get more actively involved and start driving the series if
> > > > Heikki is busy. Thoughts, anyone ?
> > > 
> > > It is not clear to me where we were. It seems to me that we found
> > > the API good but disagreed about locking. Does that sum it up?
> > 
> > I'll remove the locks and resend.
> > 
> I have a new version of my patch set ready. Should I wait for your update
> or send it now ?

Please wait. I'm going to send my update today.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki