[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2696e440-af5f-e6b0-aac4-e26789eaa56d@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:41:41 +0530
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, "Davis, Andrew" <afd@...com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: Increase timeout value
waiting for ADC sample
On Monday 15 August 2016 09:17 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 08/08/16 12:05, Vignesh R wrote:
>> Now that open delay and sample delay for each channel is configurable
>> via DT, the default IDLE_TIMEOUT value is not enough as this is
>> calculated based on hardcoded macros. This results in driver returning
>> EBUSY sometimes. Fix this by increasing the timeout
>> value based on maximum value possible to open delay and sample delays
>> for each channel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
> As with patch 1 could you provide a fixes tag as well highlighting the
> patch that introduced the issue. I'm thinking you are referring to:
>
> iio: adc: ti_am335x_adc: make sample delay, open delay, averaging DT parameters
> 5dc11e810676ec4a5acb4423ccd33314bf74f4e54
Yes, will send v2 with fixes tag pointing to above commit. Thanks!
--
Regards
Vignesh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists