[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471432466.4887.134.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:14:26 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
dinh.linux@...iebear.net
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
peter@...leysoftware.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND] serial: 8250: fix regression in 8250 uart driver
On Sat, 2016-07-02 at 13:53 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 14.06.2016 18:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 10:27 -0500, dinh.linux@...iebear.net wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 21:59 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > > Does this mean that the 8250_dw.c driver can no longer use DMA?
> >
> > It means that previously the use of DMA engine whatever was used is
> > not
> > correct in your case. There is no issues in UART driver, the issue
> > is in
> > DMA controller driver.
> >
> > I'm working on a quirk that will allow user to enforce PIO mode for
> > Rx/Tx or both. In that case if DMA controller can't be fixed you
> > still
> > might use DMA for Tx.
>
> What's the status of this issue? Just wondering, as this issue is
> listed
> in my regression reports for 4.7 and it seems nothing much happened
> for
> more than a week now – which is a bad sign as the 4.7 release seems
> only
> a week or two away.
I sent a v2 of the series for internal review, same you may found on
[1]. If Heikki is okay to that I'll send it here.
[1] https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux/branch/topic%2Fdw%2Fqrk
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists