lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57B44D2E.2030301@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:10:30 +0530
From:	Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
To:	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Use of copy_from_user in msm_gem_submit.c while holding a spin_lock

Hello,

I was wondering about the call to copy_from_user in function submit_lookup_objects for drive
/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c  It calls copy_from_user[1] in a spin_lock, which is not normally
allowed, due to the possibility of a deadlock.  

Is there some reason that I am overlooking why it is OK in this case? Is there some code in the
same file which ensures that page fault will not occur when we are calling the function holding
spin_lock?

Thank you.

[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c#L85

-- 
Vaishali

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ