[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471451765.4075.205.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:36:05 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG and WARN kernel log levels
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:00 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 11:53 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So, I noticed that asm-gemeric/bug.h defines BUG() without a log level:
> >
> > #ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
> > #define BUG() do { \
> > printk("BUG: failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__); \
> >
> > Seems like it should have one?
> >
> > Also, I think we might want to examine WARN() a bit... it doesn't have
> > a log level either, but only a fraction of callers set one:
> >
> > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep -v KERN_ | wc -l
> > 2735
> >
> > $ git grep -E 'WARN(_TAINT|)(_RATELIMIT|_ONCE|)\([^\)]' | grep KERN_ | wc -l
> > 77
> >
> > If I'm reading checkpatch.pl correctly, it doesn't warn about missing
> > log levels on WARN calls, but I think it should.
> >
> > How do you think is best to clean this up?
> >
> > Mainly, I'd like to add a format string to BUG, or introduce a new
> > BUGish call that takes a format...
> I once suggested something similar awhile ago.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/7/8/261
And here I submitted patches:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/30/176
Powered by blists - more mailing lists