linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:01:18 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
Cc:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	rruigrok@...eaurora.org, harba@...eaurora.org,
	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
	wei@...hat.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT
 support in arm_arch_timer

Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64
> directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on
> the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning
> out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created
> in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of
> Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull
> request.
>
> If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes,
> you can proceed as above.

What's the latest on this patchset?  I really want them in 4.9.  Is 
everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved.

Who will be merging these patches?

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.  Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.