linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself as Samsung SPI maintainer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPevQ9c0ZPSWLftXe05VQad0HsPcnjot1H2QZe027S_W8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:05:43 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself as Samsung SPI maintainer

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com> wrote:
>> Create a new entry for the Samsung SPI driver supported by the
>> drivers/spi/spi-s3c* and remove it from its original place under
>> "ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES".
>>
>> The original maintainership inherited from the Samsung Exynos
>> ARM Architecture is kept as it was (i.e. Kukjin and Krzysztof), I
>> will help and co-maintain the driver.
>>
>> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>> CC: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
>> CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>> CC: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
>> CC: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch depends on Krzysztof's previous patch-set on the
>> MAINTAINER file: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/16/571
>
> Thanks for taking care of SPI. From my side:
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>
> I think there is no strict dependency on my patch (patches do not
> overlap) so it can safely go through SPI tree if accepted.

One thought. Probably you should extend the entry to cover all the SPI files:
include/linux/platform_data/spi-s3c64xx.h
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt

Best regards,
Krzysztof