[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57B56A09.50402@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:55:53 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: cpuidle: Fix error return code
On 08/18/2016 03:13 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 04:16:09 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 08/11/2016 03:02 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> We know that 'ret = 0' because it has been tested a few lines above.
>>> So, if 'kzalloc' fails, 0 will be returned instead of an error code.
>>> Return -ENOMEM instead.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a0d46a3dfdc3 ("ARM: cpuidle: Register per cpuidle device")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>>
>> Applied, thanks !
>
> Daniel, I've applied it too and earlier.
Ok, thanks for the head up.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists