linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 51/57] x86/unwind: warn if stack grows up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:06:31 -0500
From:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 51/57] x86/unwind: warn if stack grows up

Add a sanity check to ensure the stack only grows down, and print a
warning if the check fails.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
index 4dbdf4f..140dac4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c
@@ -32,6 +32,15 @@ unsigned long unwind_get_return_address(struct unwind_state *state)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_get_return_address);
 
+static size_t regs_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	/* x86_32 regs from kernel mode are two words shorter */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32) && !user_mode(regs))
+		return sizeof(*regs) - (2*sizeof(long));
+
+	return sizeof(*regs);
+}
+
 static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
 {
 	unsigned long bp = (unsigned long)state->bp;
@@ -86,6 +95,7 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
 	struct pt_regs *regs;
 	unsigned long *next_bp, *next_frame;
 	size_t next_len;
+	enum stack_type prev_type = state->stack_info.type;
 
 	if (unwind_done(state))
 		return false;
@@ -149,6 +159,18 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
 		goto bad_address;
 	}
 
+	/* make sure it only unwinds up and doesn't overlap the last frame */
+	if (state->stack_info.type == prev_type) {
+		if (state->regs &&
+		    (void *)next_frame < (void *)state->regs +
+					 regs_size(state->regs))
+			goto bad_address;
+
+		if (state->bp &&
+		    (void *)next_frame < (void *)state->bp + FRAME_HEADER_SIZE)
+			goto bad_address;
+	}
+
 	/* move to the next frame */
 	if (regs) {
 		state->regs = regs;
@@ -165,12 +187,12 @@ bad_address:
 		printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
 			"WARNING: kernel stack regs at %p in %s:%d has bad 'bp' value %p\n",
 			state->regs, state->task->comm,
-			state->task->pid, next_bp);
+			state->task->pid, next_frame);
 	else
 		printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
 			"WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at %p in %s:%d has bad value %p\n",
 			state->bp, state->task->comm,
-			state->task->pid, next_bp);
+			state->task->pid, next_frame);
 the_end:
 	state->stack_info.type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
 	return false;
-- 
2.7.4