linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/57] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160818133935.GA3737@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:39:35 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/57] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:

> > Josh Poimboeuf (57):
> 
> I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series.
> 
> Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing so 
> increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve maintainance...

Yes, please!

Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest risk / 
simplest towards highest risk / most complex.

Thanks,

	Ingo