lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160818034513.GA21415@nazgul.tnic>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:45:13 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, lkp@...org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [x86/hweight] 65ea11ec6a:
 will-it-scale.per_process_ops 9.3% improvement

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:29:04PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> branch-miss-rate decreased from ~0.30% to ~0.043%.
> 
> So I guess there are some code alignment change, which caused decreased
> branch miss rate.

Hrrm, I still can't imagine how that would happen if the machine
supports POPCNT and we never call the __sw_hweight* variants. Or does
it?

Can you paste /proc/cpuinfo from that Sandy Bridge-EP box?

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ