[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160818034513.GA21415@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 05:45:13 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, lkp@...org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [x86/hweight] 65ea11ec6a:
will-it-scale.per_process_ops 9.3% improvement
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:29:04PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> branch-miss-rate decreased from ~0.30% to ~0.043%.
>
> So I guess there are some code alignment change, which caused decreased
> branch miss rate.
Hrrm, I still can't imagine how that would happen if the machine
supports POPCNT and we never call the __sw_hweight* variants. Or does
it?
Can you paste /proc/cpuinfo from that Sandy Bridge-EP box?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists