linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.7 112/186] cgroupns: Close race between cgroup_post_fork and copy_cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:58:49 +0200
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.7 112/186] cgroupns: Close race between cgroup_post_fork and copy_cgroup_ns

4.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

commit eedd0f4cbf5f3b81e82649832091e1d9d53f0709 upstream.

In most code paths involving cgroup migration cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem
is taken.  There are two exceptions:

- remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset calls cgroup_transfer_tasks
- vhost_attach_cgroups_work calls cgroup_attach_task_all

With cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem held it is guaranteed that cgroup_post_fork
and copy_cgroup_ns will reference the same css_set from the process calling
fork.

Without such an interlock there process after fork could reference one
css_set from it's new cgroup namespace and another css_set from
task->cgroups, which semantically is nonsensical.

Fixes: a79a908fd2b0 ("cgroup: introduce cgroup namespaces")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/cgroup.c |    5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2962,6 +2962,7 @@ int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_s
 	int retval = 0;

 	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
+	percpu_down_write(&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem);
 	for_each_root(root) {
 		struct cgroup *from_cgrp;

@@ -2976,6 +2977,7 @@ int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_s
 		if (retval)
 			break;
 	}
+	percpu_up_write(&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem);
 	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);

 	return retval;
@@ -4343,6 +4345,8 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup

 	mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);

+	percpu_down_write(&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem);
+
 	/* all tasks in @from are being moved, all csets are source */
 	spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(link, &from->cset_links, cset_link)
@@ -4371,6 +4375,7 @@ int cgroup_transfer_tasks(struct cgroup
 	} while (task && !ret);
 out_err:
 	cgroup_migrate_finish(&preloaded_csets);
+	percpu_up_write(&cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem);
 	mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
 	return ret;
 }