lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160818103429.1d76132f@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:34:29 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
	Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/57] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:39:35 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > > Josh Poimboeuf (57):  
> > 
> > I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series.
> > 
> > Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing so 
> > increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve maintainance...  
> 
> Yes, please!
> 
> Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest risk / 
> simplest towards highest risk / most complex.
> 

 +1

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ