[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160818103429.1d76132f@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:34:29 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/57] x86/dumpstack: rewrite x86 stack dump code
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:39:35 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > Josh Poimboeuf (57):
> >
> > I am personally unable to review a 57 patches series.
> >
> > Any chance you could split it into self-contained steps? In general doing so
> > increase the chances for reviews, accelerate merging, improve maintainance...
>
> Yes, please!
>
> Series of no more than 4-6 patches, ordered in a logical fasion from lowest risk /
> simplest towards highest risk / most complex.
>
+1
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists