[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160818144149.GO30162@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:41:49 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc, smaps: reduce printing overhead
On Thu 18-08-16 16:26:16, Michal Hocko wrote:
> b) doesn't it try to be overly clever when doing that in the caller
> doesn't cost all that much? Sure you can save few bytes in the spaces
> but then I would just argue to use \t rather than fixed string length.
ohh, I misread the code. It tries to emulate the width formater. But is
this really necessary? Do we know about any tools doing a fixed string
parsing?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists