[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyiAOSM=ubzfOtdMx6e6vAmDS4JYW4sUU-5sQKPPzWBdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:41:39 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usercopy: Skip multi-page bounds checking on SLOB
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> When an allocator does not mark all allocations as PageSlab, or does not
> mark multipage allocations with __GFP_COMP, hardened usercopy cannot
> correctly validate the allocation. SLOB lacks this, so short-circuit
> the checking for the allocators that aren't marked with
> CONFIG_HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR. This also updates the config
> help and corrects a typo in the usercopy comments.
I think I'm going to instead do just this:
diff --git a/security/Kconfig b/security/Kconfig
index df28f2b6f3e1..da10d9b573a4 100644
--- a/security/Kconfig
+++ b/security/Kconfig
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ config HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY
config HARDENED_USERCOPY
bool "Harden memory copies between kernel and userspace"
depends on HAVE_ARCH_HARDENED_USERCOPY
+ depends on HAVE_HARDENED_USERCOPY_ALLOCATOR
select BUG
help
This option checks for obviously wrong memory regions when
which basically disables the hardened usercopy for SLOB systems.
Nobody cares, because nobody should use SLOB anyway, and certainly
wouldn't use it with hardening.
Let's see if we get any other warnings with that..
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists