[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471637924.3893.48.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:18:44 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs, proc: optimize smaps output formatting
On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 10:43 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> And this would definitely be faster if seq_has_overflowed() was
> used somewhere in the iteration loop.
Adding a seq_has_overflowed() test seems unnecessary as the
fs/seq_file.c traverse() static function already does a
seq_has_overflowed().
And I get:
$ t_mm (your allocate all vma program modified to show count)
count: 65514 pid:2051
$ wc -c /proc/2051/smapsĀ
39515615 /proc/2051/smaps
smap vma output is a little more than 600 bytes per vma.
I'll look around to see how best go use single_open_size
assuming 768 bytes/vma rounded up to the next PAGE_SIZE.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists