[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1471639427-16006-1-git-send-email-smuckle@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:43:47 -0700
From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: cpufreq: ignore SMT when determining max cpu capacity
PELT does not consider SMT when scaling its utilization values via
arch_scale_cpu_capacity(). The value in rq->cpu_capacity_orig does
take SMT into consideration though and therefore may be smaller than
the utilization reported by PELT.
On an Intel i7-3630QM for example rq->cpu_capacity_orig is 589 but
util_avg scales up to 1024. This means that a 50% utilized CPU will show
up in schedutil as ~86% busy.
Fix this by using the same CPU scaling value in schedutil as that which
is used by PELT.
Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 60d985f4dc47..cb8a77b1ef1b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -147,7 +147,9 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long util,
static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
{
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
- unsigned long cfs_max = rq->cpu_capacity_orig;
+ unsigned long cfs_max;
+
+ cfs_max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id());
*util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg, cfs_max);
*max = cfs_max;
--
2.7.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists