[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4a230960-6e69-a513-cd27-b2919903be2d@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:43:30 +0700
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
CC: <joro@...tes.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
<alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PART2 PATCH v5 12/12] svm: Implements update_pi_irte hook to
setup posted interrupt
Hi Radim,
On 8/16/16 23:33, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> Maybe I was a bit confused by reusing amd_iommu_pi_data when all we care
>>> >> about is a list of cur->ir_data -- can't we have a list of just ir_data?
>> >
>> > Actually, in SVM, we care about posted-interrupt information, which is
>> > generated from the SVM side, and stored in the amd_iommu_pi_data. This is
>> > also communicated to IOMMU via the irq_set_vcpu_affinity().
>> >
>> > Here, I only use ir_data to differentiate amd_iommu_pi_data.
> I'm still confused then. :)
>
> struct amd_iommu_pi_data is a throwaway structure for I/O with
> irq_set_vcpu_affinity(), but we keep it afterwards ...
> is it more than a wrapper that allows us to put ir_data into a list,
> because we don't want to add list_head directly to ir_data?
Hm... I see you point now. I'll change it to ir_data list.
Thanks,
Suraveee
Powered by blists - more mailing lists