lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:53:10 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>, sgrubb@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] Add support for session ID user filtering

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com> wrote:
> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Session-ID-User-Filter
> RFE Session ID User Filter
>
> https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/4
> RFE: add a session ID filter to the kernel's user filter
>
> See also the set of userspace suport patches:
>         Add support for sessionid user filters, sessionid_set and loginuid_set
>         https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2016-August/msg00005.html
>         (userspace update expected to be posted 2016-08-18)
> and the test case:
>         https://github.com/rgbriggs/audit-testsuite/tree/ghak4-test-for-sessionID-user-filter
>
> This third patch is expected to have a merge conflict with:
>         "audit: add exclude filter extension to feature bitmap"
> posted on 2016-08-18.
>
> Richard Guy Briggs (3):
>   audit: add support for session ID user filter
>   audit: add AUDIT_SESSIONID_SET support
>   audit: add sessionid filter extension to feature bitmap
>
>  include/linux/audit.h      |   10 ++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/audit.h |    6 +++++-
>  kernel/auditfilter.c       |    5 +++++
>  kernel/auditsc.c           |    6 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

These patches look fine to me; the only comment I have is that these
should probably be combined into a single patch to avoid
cherry-picking of individual pieces, e.g. skipping the feature bitmap
or AUDIT_SESSION_SET support.  I can do that when I merge the patches,
no need to resend unless you really want to ...

However, the bigger issue is coordination with the userspace patches.
I really don't like merging kernel patches until Steve OK's the
corresponding userspace patches.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ