linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 031/100] fs/nilfs2: fix potential underflow in call to crc32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <336acc72ee82761d814d10ea320021a2cb78dd85.1471589700.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:10:30 +0200
From:   Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@...unet.com>,
        Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 031/100] fs/nilfs2: fix potential underflow in call to crc32_le

From: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@...unet.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 63d2f95d63396059200c391ca87161897b99e74a upstream.

The value `bytes' comes from the filesystem which is about to be
mounted.  We cannot trust that the value is always in the range we
expect it to be.

Check its value before using it to calculate the length for the crc32_le
call.  It value must be larger (or equal) sumoff + 4.

This fixes a kernel bug when accidentially mounting an image file which
had the nilfs2 magic value 0x3434 at the right offset 0x406 by chance.
The bytes 0x01 0x00 were stored at 0x408 and were interpreted as a
s_bytes value of 1.  This caused an underflow when substracting sumoff +
4 (20) in the call to crc32_le.

  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88021e600000
  IP:  crc32_le+0x36/0x100
  ...
  Call Trace:
    nilfs_valid_sb.part.5+0x52/0x60 [nilfs2]
    nilfs_load_super_block+0x142/0x300 [nilfs2]
    init_nilfs+0x60/0x390 [nilfs2]
    nilfs_mount+0x302/0x520 [nilfs2]
    mount_fs+0x38/0x160
    vfs_kern_mount+0x67/0x110
    do_mount+0x269/0xe00
    SyS_mount+0x9f/0x100
    entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x71

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1466778587-5184-2-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp
Signed-off-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@...unet.com>
Tested-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
index 94c451ce6d24..30c047e0bad2 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int nilfs_valid_sb(struct nilfs_super_block *sbp)
 	if (!sbp || le16_to_cpu(sbp->s_magic) != NILFS_SUPER_MAGIC)
 		return 0;
 	bytes = le16_to_cpu(sbp->s_bytes);
-	if (bytes > BLOCK_SIZE)
+	if (bytes < sumoff + 4 || bytes > BLOCK_SIZE)
 		return 0;
 	crc = crc32_le(le32_to_cpu(sbp->s_crc_seed), (unsigned char *)sbp,
 		       sumoff);
-- 
2.9.3