[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160819074508.GW17850@mail.corp.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:45:08 +0200
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Duggan <andrew@...gan.us>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Vincent Huang <vincent.huang@...synaptics.com>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Nitin Chaudhary <nitinchaudhary1289@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: synaptics-rmi4: Fix register descriptor subpacket
map construction
Hi Andrew,
On Aug 18 2016 or thereabouts, Andrew Duggan wrote:
> From: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>
>
> The map_offset variable is specific to the register and needs to be reset
> in the loop. Otherwise, subsequent register's subpacket maps will have
> their bits set at the wrong index. This results in the max X and Y and
> the resolution to not be set on some devices which use F12.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>
> Tested-by: Nitin Chaudhary <nitinchaudhary1289@...il.com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> In rmi_f12_read_sensor_tuning() we call rmi_register_desc_has_subpacket()
> to check the subpacket map to make sure a subpacket exists to ensure that
> the buffer contains the correct data. It happened that on my the test
> devices the register we were checking was also the first register. This
> issues showed up on newer devices where F12 CTRL 8 is not teh first control
> register.
I just have one minor nitpick:
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> index 2b6b97e..19843f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_driver.c
> @@ -553,10 +553,10 @@ int rmi_read_register_desc(struct rmi_device *d, u16 addr,
> goto free_struct_buff;
>
> reg = find_first_bit(rdesc->presense_map, RMI_REG_DESC_PRESENSE_BITS);
> - map_offset = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < rdesc->num_registers; i++) {
> struct rmi_register_desc_item *item = &rdesc->registers[i];
> int reg_size = struct_buf[offset];
There should be a blank line here (coding style).
> + map_offset = 0;
I'd rather see this reset just before the do/while loop given that it's
IMO clearer what is happening.
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cheers,
Benjamin
>
> ++offset;
> if (reg_size == 0) {
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists