linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zioaj6vq.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>
Date:   Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:59:05 -0700
From:   Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To:     Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arm@...nel.org,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk> writes:

> This file is included from DTS files under arch/arm64 too (via
> broadcom/bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dts and broadcom/bcm2837.dtsi). There is a desire
> not to have skeleton.dtsi for ARM64. See commit 3ebee5a2e141 ("arm64: dts:
> kill skeleton.dtsi") for rationale for its removal.
>
> As well as the addition of #*-cells also requires adding the device_type to
> the rpi memory node explicitly.
>
> Note that this change results in the removal of an empty /aliases node from
> bcm2835-rpi-a.dtb and bcm2835-rpi-a-plus.dtb. I have no hardware to check
> if this is a problem or not.
>
> It also results in some reordering of the nodes in the DTBs (the /aliases
> and /memory nodes come later). This isn't supposed to matter but, again,
> I've no hardware to check if it is true in this particular case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>

I'd lost track of these patches, sorry.  Both are:

Acked-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>

They're going through the -soc tree, right?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)