[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57B708A1.9010607@sakamocchi.jp>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 22:24:49 +0900
From: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
To: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: Use of copy_to_user in fireworks_hwdep.c while holding a
spin_lock
Hi,
On Aug 19 2016 15:24, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> I was wondering about the call to copy_to_user in function hwdep_read_locked and
> hwdep_read_resp_buf for driver sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_hwdep.c.
> The function hwdep_read calls both of these functions while holding a spinlock[1],
> which is not normally allowed due to the possibility of a deadlock.
>
> This seems to be coming from the commit 555e8a8f7f149544eb7d4aa3a6420bc4c3055638
> while adding a command/response functionality into hwdep interface. Is there some
> reason that I am overlooking, why it is OK in this case? Is there some code in the
> same file which ensures that page fault will not occur when we are calling these
> functions while holding a spin_lock_irq?
>
> The same issue is there with the driver sound/firewire/tascam/tascam-hwdep.c for
> obvious reasons.
>
> Coccinelle script is used to detect this issue.
>
> Thank you.
>
> [1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/sound/firewire/fireworks/fireworks_hwdep.c#L114
Indeed, I was unaware of the situation in which deadlock occurs; i.e.
page fault.
I'm on short summer vacation, so will post patches for them in next week.
Thanks
Takashi Sakamoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists