linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ntb: Add asynchronous devices support to NTB-bus interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000001d1fa1f$6cddf230$4699d690$@emc.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Aug 2016 09:41:41 -0400
From:   "Allen Hubbe" <Allen.Hubbe@....com>
To:     "'Serge Semin'" <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc:     <jdmason@...zu.us>, <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        <Xiangliang.Yu@....com>, <Sergey.Semin@...latforms.ru>,
        <linux-ntb@...glegroups.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] ntb: Add asynchronous devices support to NTB-bus interface

From: Serge Semin
> 3) IDT driver redevelopment will take a lot of time, since I don't have much free time to
> do it. It may be half of year or even more.
> 
> From my side, such an improvement will significantly complicate the NTB Kernel API. Since
> you are the subsystem maintainer it's your decision which design to choose, but I don't think
> I'll do the IDT driver suitable for this design anytime soon.

I'm sorry to have made you feel that way.

> > I hope we got it settled now. If not, We can have a Skype conversation, since writing
> such a long letters takes lot of time.

Come join irc.oftc.net #ntb