[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi56cU5zicwKmHh_QfNj8fg_7WXvmRC8SgGouzGiMSeFkkXNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:40:15 -0500
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
petr@...ix.com,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] da8xx USB PHY platform devices and clocks (was
"da8xx UBS clocks")
David,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Saturday 13 August 2016 02:54 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> wrote:
> >> On Monday 23 May 2016 08:44 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> >>> On 05/09/2016 06:46 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> >>>> v5 changes: renamed "usbphy" to "usb_phy" or "usb-phy" as appropriate
> >>>>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>>
> >>> What should I be doing to keep this moving along?
> >>
> >> We need the related driver changes to be applied first. I could then use
> >> an immutable branch to push the platform changes against.
> >>
> >> I did take a look at the patches and they look good to me. Except the
> >> one comment from Sergei which I just now indicated that I agree with.
> >
> > Just checking on the status of this. I'm not seeing the driver
> > changes in mainline yet.
> >
> > Any update?
>
> phy driver is already merged which actually introduced a compilation error. The
> fix for it is currently queued in linux-phy -fixes and it should be merged in
> this -rc cycle.
> I think it would be better if David Lechner re-spins the series re-based on top
> of latest mainline kernel and then merged by Bin/Alan.
Does this work for you?
Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists