linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] hostap: Delete an unnecessary jump label in prism2_ioctl_priv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGRGNgW3tCpLqs56DXW65_Du8HD+oYt-St3Oc6C6WLeungM51g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:45:13 +1000
From:   Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] hostap: Delete an unnecessary jump label in prism2_ioctl_priv_hostapd()

Hi Marcus,

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 2:46 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:21:29 +0200
>
> Remove a jump label which is unneeded in this function at the end.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c
> index 4e271f9..5942917 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intersil/hostap/hostap_ioctl.c
> @@ -3835,14 +3835,12 @@ static int prism2_ioctl_priv_hostapd(local_info_t *local, struct iw_point *p)
>         }
>
>         if (ret == 1 || !ap_ioctl) {
> -               if (copy_to_user(p->pointer, param, p->length)) {
> +               if (copy_to_user(p->pointer, param, p->length))
>                         ret = -EFAULT;
> -                       goto out;
> -               } else if (ap_ioctl)
> +               else if (ap_ioctl)
>                         ret = 0;
>         }
>
> - out:

Does this change make any difference to the compiled code?

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/