linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] clk: samsung: exynos: Fix the checkpatch warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <432d1876-d561-6c4e-6808-b7761d128e94@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:06:20 +0200
From:   Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     tomasz.figa@...il.com, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
        chanwoo@...nel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] clk: samsung: exynos: Fix the checkpatch warnings

Hi Chanwoo,

On 08/22/2016 11:48 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> This patches just fix the checkpatch warnings for exynos5433/3250/5260/5420/4
> series without the behavior changes.
> 
> Chanwoo Choi (5):
>   clk: samsung: exynos5433: Fix the checkpatch warnings
>   clk: samsung: exynos3250: Fix the checkpatch warnings
>   clk: samsung: exynos5260: Fix the checkpatch warnings
>   clk: samsung: exynos5420: Fix the checkpatch warnings
>   clk: samsung: exynos4: Fix the checkpatch warnings
> 
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos3250.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    | 51 ++++++++++---------
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c |  4 +-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 11 ++--
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5433.c |  6 ++-
>  5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

Sorry, but I have to NAK this whole series.  It's just an unnecessary
churn and will cause problems when applying real development patches
that are being worked on.

-- 
Thanks,
Sylwester