[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1471865054.4887.206.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:24:14 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com,
z.liuxinliang@...ilicon.com, xuwei5@...ilicon.com,
graeme.gregory@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] serial: 8250_dw: add ACPI support for uart on
Hisilicon Hip05 soc
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 19:01 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Use built-in device properties to set device parameters for the
> existing device probed by acpi.
acpi -> ACPI
>
> Add ACPI identifier for UART on Hisilicon Hip05 soc, be careful
soc -> SoC
> that it is not 16550 compatibal, so we need set "reg-io-width"
compatibal -> compatible
> and "reg-shift" by _DSD method in DSDT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> index d6934310..5ab9cfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> @@ -297,12 +297,6 @@ static void dw8250_quirks(struct uart_port *p,
> struct dw8250_data *data)
> p->serial_in = dw8250_serial_in32be;
> p->serial_out = dw8250_serial_out32be;
> }
> - } else if (has_acpi_companion(p->dev)) {
> - p->iotype = UPIO_MEM32;
> - p->regshift = 2;
> - p->serial_in = dw8250_serial_in32;
> - /* So far none of there implement the Busy
> Functionality */
> - data->uart_16550_compatible = true;
> }
>
> /* Platforms with iDMA */
> @@ -352,6 +346,19 @@ static void dw8250_setup_port(struct uart_port
> *p)
> up->capabilities |= UART_CAP_AFE;
> }
>
> +static struct property_entry dw8250_properties[] = {
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("reg-io-width", 4),
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("reg-shift", 2),
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL("snps,uart-16550-compatible"),
> + { },
> +};
> +
> +/* non 16550 compatible id list*/
non 16550 -> Non-16550
Space before */
> +static const struct acpi_device_id non_16550_ids[] = {
> + { "HISI0031", 0 },
> + { },
> +};
> +
> static int dw8250_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct uart_8250_port uart = {};
> @@ -395,6 +402,9 @@ static int dw8250_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> if (!data)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + if (has_acpi_companion(dev) &&
> !acpi_match_device(non_16550_ids, dev))
> + platform_device_add_properties(pdev,
> dw8250_properties);
What if we probe device which has already properties assigned?
Heikki, are you good with such trick?
> +
> data->dma.fn = dw8250_fallback_dma_filter;
> data->usr_reg = DW_UART_USR;
> p->private_data = data;
> @@ -619,6 +629,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id
> dw8250_acpi_match[] = {
> { "APMC0D08", 0},
> { "AMD0020", 0 },
> { "AMDI0020", 0 },
> + { "HISI0031", 0 },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, dw8250_acpi_match);
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists