[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160822150115.0fe8f20c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:01:15 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM-S390: Delete an unnecessary initialisation for
a buffer variable
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:12:15 +0200
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:28:15 +0200
>
> The variable "bp_data" will eventually be set to an appropriate pointer
> from a call of the memdup_user() function.
> Thus omit the explicit initialisation which became unnecessary with
> a previous update step.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> index f2514af..ad04609 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/guestdbg.c
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int kvm_s390_import_bp_data(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> {
> int ret = 0, nr_wp = 0, nr_bp = 0, i, size;
> - struct kvm_hw_breakpoint *bp_data = NULL;
> + struct kvm_hw_breakpoint *bp_data;
> struct kvm_hw_wp_info_arch *wp_info = NULL;
> struct kvm_hw_bp_info_arch *bp_info = NULL;
>
NACK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists