[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57BB23CB.2080908@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:09:47 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, rt@...utronix.de,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] cpuidle: pseries: Convert to hotplug state machine
On 08/18/2016 02:57 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Install the callbacks via the state machine.
>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> index 5811954809af..baecc4faf028 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
> CPUHP_MM_WRITEBACK_DEAD,
> CPUHP_SOFTIRQ_DEAD,
> CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
> + CPUHP_CPUIDLE_PSERIES_DEAD,
Can't we directly merge these into CPUHP_CPUIDLE_DEAD instead ? Or is it
planned to be done separately ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists