[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160822163724.GA11327@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:37:25 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] efi/libstub: Allocate headspace in
efi_get_memory_map()
* Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> + efi_boottime_memory_map_t map;
>
> nr_desc = 0;
> e820ext = NULL;
> e820ext_size = 0;
> + map.map = &mem_map;
> + map.map_size = &map_sz;
> + map.desc_size = &desc_size;
> + map.desc_ver = &desc_version;
> + map.key_ptr = &key;
> + map.buff_size = &buff_size;
> + *map->desc_size = sizeof(*m);
> + *map->map_size = *map->desc_size * 32;
> + *map->buff_size = *map->map_size;
> + boot_map.map = (efi_memory_desc_t **)&map.map;
> + boot_map.map_size = &map_size;
> + boot_map.desc_size = &map.desc_size;
> + boot_map.desc_ver = NULL;
> + boot_map.key_ptr = NULL;
> + boot_map.buff_size = &buff_size;
> + boot_map.map = ↦
> + boot_map.map_size = &map_size;
> + boot_map.desc_size = &desc_size;
> + boot_map.desc_ver = NULL;
> + boot_map.key_ptr = NULL;
> + boot_map.buff_size = &buff_size;
> + efi_boottime_memory_map_t boot_map;
> +
> + boot_map.map = ↦
> + boot_map.map_size = &map_size;
> + boot_map.desc_size = &desc_size;
> + boot_map.desc_ver = NULL;
> + boot_map.key_ptr = NULL;
> + boot_map.buff_size = &buff_size;
> + efi_boottime_memory_map_t map;
> +
> + map.map = &runtime_map;
> + map.map_size = &map_size;
> + map.desc_size = &desc_size;
> + map.desc_ver = &desc_ver;
> + map.key_ptr = &mmap_key;
> + map.buff_size = &buff_size;
> + efi_boottime_memory_map_t map;
>
> - status = efi_get_memory_map(sys_table_arg, &memory_map, &map_size,
> - &desc_size, NULL, NULL);
> + map.map = &memory_map;
> + map.map_size = &map_size;
> + map.desc_size = &desc_size;
> + map.desc_ver = NULL;
> + map.key_ptr = NULL;
> + map.buff_size = &buff_size;
That's really ugly - if we do such initializations then at minimum they should be
aligned vertically.
> u32 imagesize;
> } efi_capsule_header_t;
>
> +typedef struct {
> + efi_memory_desc_t **map;
> + unsigned long *map_size;
> + unsigned long *desc_size;
> + u32 *desc_ver;
> + unsigned long *key_ptr;
> + unsigned long *buff_size;
> +} efi_boottime_memory_map_t;
Ditto for structure definitions:
typedef struct {
efi_memory_desc_t **map;
unsigned long *map_size;
unsigned long *desc_size;
u32 *desc_ver;
unsigned long *key_ptr;
unsigned long *buff_size;
} efi_boottime_memory_map_t;
Plus it would be nice to just use a proper structure name instead of a typedef -
such as:
struct efi_boot_memmap {
...
};
(Note that this name is also shorter)
... in the kernel we generally only use typedefs for short, synthetic types -
bigger objects like this should be explicit structs - unless there's some strong
reason to do it via a typedef.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists