linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOw6vbJdBwUdg5Qww-autFH=HvvaM-uac7-mN+Ja7PEDiPoPnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:30:38 -0400
From:   Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
To:     Mark yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM Kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number

On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> On 2016年08月18日 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi Sean
>>> >
>>> >Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support.
>>> >
>>> >But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are deprecated,
>>> >I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream soon.
>>
>> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream patches
>> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync with
>> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development.
>> -Daniel
>>
> Yeah, Sorry for that.
>
> In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new rk3399
> patches are based on them,
> but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches,  Sean's patches is
> old version.
>
> I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to
> upstream.
> but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) .
>
> merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches.
>

Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then?
Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that
depends on these changes.

Sean


> Thanks.
>
> --
> Ｍark Yao
>
>