[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y43ozd8h.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 14:48:46 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86/head: remove useless zeroed word
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> writes:
> This zeroed word has no apparent purpose, so remove it.
>
> Brian Gerst says:
>
> "FYI the word used to be the SS segment selector for the LSS
> instruction, which isn't needed in 64-bit mode."
>
Seems dangerous. It wouldn't surprise me if some CPUs or x86 emulations
load it anyways and trigger page faults if there is really nothing
there.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists