lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:12:56 -0400
From:   Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:     Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PCI/PCIe: make DPC explicitly non-modular

[Re: [PATCH -next] PCI/PCIe: make DPC explicitly non-modular] On 22/08/2016 (Mon 14:44) Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:28:02PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

[...]

> > 
> > Yep, not to worry, I've still got the following patches pending for-4.9:
> > 
> > $ grep PCI series 
> > # PCI
> > PCI-aerdrv-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-altera-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-dra7xx-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-imx6-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-pme-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-qcom-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-spear13xx-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-xilinx-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-xilinx-nwl-make-it-eplicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-portdrv-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-PCIe-make-dpc-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-generic-make-host-common-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-hotplug_core-make-it-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> > PCI-hotplug-make-core-code-explicitly-non-modular.patch
> 
> Were you planning to post the patches above?  If so, I'll bundle them
> all up along with this DPC one.

Ha, too funny; I'd just split the remaining patches into two lots and
sent lot #1 (the binary equivalent ones) before seeing this.

The DPC one got put in lot #2 since it had __exit and/or .remove
functions, so the change isn't strictly binary equivalent anymore.

I'll send along lot #2 once you've had a chance to digest lot #1.
So feel free to ignore the earlier copy of the DPC one.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ