linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm, numa: boot cpu should bound to the node0 when node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57BBFF8B.80801@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2016 15:47:23 +0800
From:   zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
CC:     Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, numa: boot cpu should bound to the node0 when node_off
 enable

On 2016/8/22 22:28, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 05:38:59PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
>> On 2016/8/19 12:11, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
>>> <gpkulkarni@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM, zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2016/8/19 1:45, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Catalin Marinas
>>>>>> <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 09:09:26PM +0800, zhongjiang wrote:
>>>>>>>> At present, boot cpu will bound to a node from device tree when node_off enable.
>>>>>>>> if the node is not initialization, it will lead to a following problem.
> [...]
>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu)
>>>>>>>>  void __init early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
>>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>>>       /* fallback to node 0 */
>>>>>>>> -     if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES)
>>>>>>>> +     if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || numa_off)
>>>>>> i  did not understood how this line change fixes the issue that you
>>>>>> have mentioned (i too not understood fully the issue description)
>>>>>> this array used while mapping node id when secondary cores comes up
>>>>>> when numa_off is set the cpu_to_node_map[cpu] is not used and set to
>>>>>> node0 always( refer function numa_store_cpu_info)..
>>>>>> please provide more details to understand the issue you are facing.
>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>  *  Set the cpu to node and mem mapping
>>>>>>  */
>>>>>> void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>         map_cpu_to_node(cpu, numa_off ? 0 : cpu_to_node_map[cpu]);
>>>>>> }
>>>>> The issue comes up when we test the kdump. it will leads to kernel crash.
>>>>> when I debug the issue, I find boot cpu actually bound to the node1. while
>>>>> node1 is not real existence when numa_off enable.
>>>> boot cpu is default mapped to node0
>>>> are you running with any other patches?
>>> if you added any patch to change this code
>>>   /* init boot processor */
>>>         cpu_to_node_map[0] = 0;
>>>         map_cpu_to_node(0, 0);
>>>
>>> then adding code to take-care numa_off here might solve your issue.
>>  but in of_smp_init_cpus, boot cpu will call early_map_cpu_to_node[] to get
>>  the relation node. and the node is from devicetree.
>>
>>  you points to the code will be covered with another node. therefore, it is
>>  possible that cpu_to_node[cpu] will leads to the incorrect results. therefore,
>>  The crash will come up.
> I think I get Ganapat's point. The cpu_to_node_map[0] may be incorrectly
> set by early_map_cpu_to_node() when called from smp_init_cpus() ->
> of_parse_and_init_cpus(). However, the cpu_to_node_map[] array is *only*
> read by numa_store_cpu_info(). This latter function calls
> map_cpu_to_node() and, if numa_off, will only ever pass 0 as the nid.
>
> Given that the cpu_to_node_map[] array is static, I don't see how any
> non-zero value could leak outside the arch/arm64/mm/numa.c file.
>
> So please give more details of any additional patches you have on top of
> mainline or whether you reproduced this issue with the vanilla kernel
> (since you mentioned kdump, that's not in mainline yet).
>
Thanks for Catalin and Ganapatral.
I am sorry for that.  The mainline have solved.  The mainline changes is too much, I did not notice.