[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160823082603.GI23577@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:26:04 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>, Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>, corbet@....net,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, jmarchan@...hat.com,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Robin Humble <plaguedbypenguins@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
eric.engestrom@...tec.com, Janis Danisevskis <jdanis@...gle.com>,
calvinowens@...com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
Bryan Freed <bfreed@...omium.org>,
Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...omium.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PACTH v2 0/3] Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps
On Mon 22-08-16 19:47:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 22-08-16 19:29:36, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 22-08-16 18:45:54, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I have no idea why those numbers are so different on my laptop
> > > yet. It surely looks suspicious. I will try to debug this further
> > > tomorrow.
> >
> > Hmm, so I've tried to use my version of awk on other machine and vice
> > versa and it didn't make any difference. So this is independent on the
> > awk version it seems. So I've tried to strace /usr/bin/time and
> > wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, {ru_utime={0, 0}, ru_stime={0, 688438}, ...}) = 9128
> >
> > so the kernel indeed reports 0 user time for some reason. Note I
> > was testing with 4.7 and right now with 4.8.0-rc3 kernel (no local
> > modifications). The other machine which reports non-0 utime is 3.12
> > SLES kernel. Maybe I am hitting some accounting bug. At first I was
> > suspecting CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL because that is the main difference between
> > my and the other machine but then I've noticed that the tests I was
> > doing in kvm have this disabled too.. so it must be something else.
>
> 4.5 reports non-0 while 4.6 zero utime. NO_HZ configuration is the same
> in both kernels.
and one more thing. It is not like utime accounting would be completely
broken and always report 0. Other commands report non-0 values even on
4.6 kernels. I will try to bisect this down later today.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists