[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160823095406.GG2598@lukather>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:54:06 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sunxi: fix uart1 CTS/RTS pins at PG on
A23/A33
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:27:10AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 01:58:25PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> >> PG8, PG9 is said to be the CTS/RTS pins for UART1 according to the A23/33
> >> datasheets. However, the function is wrongly named "uart2" in the pinctrl
> >> driver. This patch fixes this by modifying them to be named "uart1".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>
> >
> > This looks good, but could you send it to stable?
>
> If that is an ACK I can tag it for stable when applying.
Yes, it's an ACK. Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists