linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:09:52 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, arm@...nel.org,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: dts: Remove use of skeleton.dtsi from bcm283x.dtsi

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 11:23:49 AM CEST Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 08:21:56AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 11:48 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 15:48 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > [...]Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
> > > > 
> > > > I also don't have the relevant hardware to test with, but this
> > > looks
> > > > generally like the right thing. So FWIW:
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > > 
> > > Thanks (and Stefan too).
> > > 
> > > I think these things generally go via the arm-soc tree? Arnd & Olaf,
> > > would it be possible to get this fix in for rc2 please (or in any event
> > > for 4.8). Although it's an external tree I believe build breakage in
> > > the split-out DT git repo is worth addressing.
> > 
> > This change doesn't appear to be in either v4.8-rc2, Linus' tree nor in
> > the arm-soc tree that I can see. So, ping?
> > 
> > Or am I barking up the wrong tree pointing this patch towards arm-soc
> > (via arm@k.o)?
> 
> That's the right place.
> 
> The best thing to do would be to resend the patch, with all tags
> accumulated, with arm-soc, Arnd, and Olof in the To line (rather than
> Cc'd), so it's clear they need to action it.

I had skipped the new message as well while sorting through 5000
messages after my vacation, but I've now put it into my TODO folder
and will get to it eventually.

We sometimes miss stuff that is meant for arm-soc when it comes
from people that don't normally send us patches. If you want to
be sure to catch the attention, stick a 'GIT PULL' into the subject
or send a ping on IRC.

The easiest way for us is when things get funnelled through the
platform maintainers that handle all the other patches, but I
can see how that may be annoying for a patch like this.

	Arnd