linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: document ASoC header files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c93b698e-fa0d-8442-3306-bd85a1e10274@m4x.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:20:16 +0200
From:   Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>
To:     Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MAINTAINERS: document ASoC header files

On 23/08/16 12:09, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Nicolas
> 
>> include/sound/simple_card_utils.h is handled by ASoC maintainers, as
>> stated in https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/8/22/307, and
>> include/sound/simple_card.h seems to be an ASoC file too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@....org>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 0bbe4b105c34..c840582d1439 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -11012,6 +11012,8 @@ S:	Supported
>>  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/
>>  F:	Documentation/sound/alsa/soc/
>>  F:	sound/soc/
>> +F:	include/sound/simple_card.h
>> +F:	include/sound/simple_card_utils.h
>>  F:	include/sound/soc*
> 
> We will have more simple_xxx_card in the future I think.
> (I posted simple_scu_card, for example)
> So, how about this or similar ? It can be just 1 line :)
> 
> 	include/sound/simple*card*

I can't tell whether all files matching this pattern in the future will
be supported by the ASoC maintainers, which is why I kept the full file
names in my patch. Nevertheless if you are confident about this, I can
modify the patch accordingly.

Thanks,
Nicolas