[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BY2PR02MB16868FAEFEA311312FA688B981EB0@BY2PR02MB1686.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:57:08 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@....fi>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH v05 04/72] dm-log-userspace.h: use __u32, __s32
and __u64 from linux/types.h
On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> - * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
> + * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
uint32_t is a type that is defined by ANSI C but __u32 not. So this
change looks wrong to me. Would it have been sufficient to add "#include
<linux/types.h>" and keep the uint32_t etc. type names?
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists