[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <0c0378e7-918b-1545-1655-43293aed4c8d@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:44:57 +0200
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH] mfd: arizona: Add gating of external
MCLKn clocks
On 08/22/2016 07:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 07:22:47PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>
>> If we provided an interface like:
>
>> struct clk * arizona_get_mclk(struct arizona *arizona, int id);
>> void arizona_put_mclk(struct clk *clk);
>
>> the machine driver would need to get hold of struct arizona*,
>> which is not that straightforward if we are given only CODEC
>> of_node (it can be a child of I2C or SPI bus).
>
> We could add an interface for the machine driver to retrieve a clock
> from the CODEC as a transition measure...
That works for me. Is the long term plan to control the CODEC's clocks
through the common clock API in machine drivers and phase out calls
like snd_soc_codec_set_pll(), snd_soc_codec_set_sysclk()?
>> Then how about specifying MCLK in the sound node and using
>> regular devm_clk_get()?
>
> This is what we're trying to avoid?
Indeed, sorry, I just started getting confused of what are acceptable
tradeoffs here.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists