linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] usb: ulpi: Support device discovery via device properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:58:07 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] usb: ulpi: Support device discovery via device properties

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Peter Chen (2016-07-08 02:04:58)
>> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 03:20:54PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > @@ -39,6 +42,10 @@ static int ulpi_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *driver)
>> >       struct ulpi *ulpi = to_ulpi_dev(dev);
>> >       const struct ulpi_device_id *id;
>> >
>> > +     /* Some ULPI devices don't have a product id so rely on OF match */
>> > +     if (ulpi->id.product == 0)
>> > +             return of_driver_match_device(dev, driver);
>> > +
>>
>> How about using vendor id? It can't be 0, but pid may be 0.
>> See: http://www.linux-usb.org/usb.ids
>
> Heikki suggested a product id of 0 would mean we need to use DT
> matching. Should it be changed to vendor id instead?

Any comments here?