[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874d0bce-cf9b-8772-5af4-ec3844b3b255@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 07:46:19 +0200
From: Corentin LABBE <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: Omer Khaliq <okhaliq@...iumnetworks.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, mpm@...enic.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
Ananth.Jasty@...ium.com, David.Daney@...ium.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] HWRNG: thunderx: Add Cavium HWRNG driver for
ThunderX SoC.
Hello
> +/* Read data from the RNG unit */
> +static int cavium_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *dat, size_t max, bool wait)
> +{
> + struct cavium_rng *p = container_of(rng, struct cavium_rng, ops);
> + unsigned int size = max;
> +
> + while (size >= 8) {
> + *((u64 *)dat) = readq(p->result);
> + size -= 8;
> + dat += 8;
> + }
I think you could use readsq()
This will increase throughput
Regards
LABBE Corentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists