[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ff4bdab-a322-8cf2-aec8-bfd4ae4c2f34@axentia.se>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:47:19 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: move locking operations to their own struct
On 2016-08-23 23:16, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:17:57AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> This makes it trivial to constify them, so do that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
>
> Looks good. Could you rebase to i2c/for-next?
Right, no problem!
Cheers,
Peter
The following changes since commit 00f0ea70d2b82b7d7afeb1bdedc9169eb8ea6675:
eeprom: at24: check if the chip is functional in probe() (2016-08-22 08:19:58 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/peda-r/i2c-mux.git i2c-lock-op
for you to fetch changes up to 4b42b8c2e3233671e49deee71458edb6737a38bf:
i2c: move locking operations to their own struct (2016-08-24 06:38:58 +0200)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Rosin (2):
i2c: add i2c_trylock_bus wrapper, use it
i2c: move locking operations to their own struct
drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 15 +++++++++------
drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/i2c.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists