linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: enable hwmon when thermal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1472027191.2682.50.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:26:31 +0800
From:   Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:     "edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        "cm-hiep@...so.co.jp" <cm-hiep@...so.co.jp>,
        hucBui <bd-phuc@...so.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar-thermal: enable hwmon when
 thermal_zone

On 三, 2016-08-24 at 08:17 +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Zhang
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
> > > > 
> > > > rcar-thermal is supporting both
> > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> > > > and
> > > > thermal_zone_device_register(). But
> > > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
> > > > doesn't enable hwmon as default.
> > > > This patch enables it to keep compatibility
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.
> > > > com>
> > > Queued for 4.9
> > > 
> > the subject should be "thermal:rcar-theraml: enable hwmon when
> > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register is used", right?
> Yes exactly.
> Should I resend v2 patch ?
> 
nop. I've already updated the patch subject.

thanks,
rui